When evaluating whether Contractor A can bid as a prime on a new source selection while they will provide testing under the current contract, which factor must be avoided?

• A. Inherently governmental functions
• B. Budget considerations
• C. Past performance
• D. Warranty period

Answer: (A)

The essential idea is that certain duties must stay with government personnel and cannot be handed to a private contractor in a source selection. When a firm is evaluated as a potential prime while they would also perform testing under the current contract, you must avoid any factor that would let that firm engage in inherently governmental functions—these are tasks that involve discretionary government decision-making, policy development, or official oversight. Allowing a contractor to perform or influence such functions during the bidding or evaluation process can compromise the integrity of the competition and undermine proper government control.

Other considerations like budget, past performance, or warranty period are part of the normal evaluation criteria and do not by themselves constitute inherently governmental functions, though they still must be weighed appropriately in the overall decision.